SEP: Review Form Template

Project Number
Document Version
Reviewer Date

Nr. Ref. Type Remark Severity Action
           
... ... ... ... ... ...
           

Legend for reviewer

Project: Name of project
Number: Number of project (1 - 8)
Document: Title of document
Version: Version of document
Reviewer: Name of reviewer
Date: Date when document received by reviewer
Leave type or severity open if not obvious and decide during meeting.
Action is always postponed until meeting.
Nr.: Sequence number of remark, starting at 1
Ref.: Reference to page/section and line number(s),
or "general"
Type: Classification of remark:
M:
Missing
X:
Extra/superfluous
A:
Ambiguous
I:
Inconsistent
U:
Improvement desirable (unclear)
S:
Not conforming to standards
R:
Risk-prone
F:
Factually incorrect
N:
Not implementable
E:
Editorial
Remark: Explanation of concern, use more lines if needed
Severity: Assessment of impact:
Major:
Anomalies that would result in failure of the software product
or an observable departure from specification.
Minor: Not major
Action: Decision about further action (made in meeting):
No action
Local change
Global change
Investigate