14th International Workshop on Business Process Intelligence 2018

to be held in conjunction with BPM 2018 Sydney, Australia, September 9 - 14, 2018


|

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
2018:challenge [2018/09/10 07:05]
bfvdonge [The Challenge]
2018:challenge [2018/09/18 12:21] (current)
bfvdonge [The Challenge]
Line 78: Line 78:
 We expect participants can focus on a //specific aspect// of interest and analyze this aspect in great detail. Here, one can choose for example to focus on specific models, such as control-flow models, social network models, performance models, predictive models, etc. We expect participants can focus on a //specific aspect// of interest and analyze this aspect in great detail. Here, one can choose for example to focus on specific models, such as control-flow models, social network models, performance models, predictive models, etc.
  
-The winner: **Jarno Brils, Nina van den Elsen, Jan de Priester and Tom Slooff** with their report entitled ​+The winner: **Jarno Brils, Nina van den Elsen, Jan de Priester and Tom Slooff** of the **[[https://​educationguide.tue.nl/​programs/​tue-honors-academy/​|Honors Academy of Eindhoven University of Techology]]** with their report entitled ​
 //​{{:​2018:​bpi2018_paper_15.pdf|Analysis and Prediction of Undesired Outcomes}}//​ //​{{:​2018:​bpi2018_paper_15.pdf|Analysis and Prediction of Undesired Outcomes}}//​
  
Line 84: Line 84:
 This category targets academics. The focus in this category is much more on the novelty of the techniques applied than the actual results. This provides a great opportunity for BPI researchers to show the practical applicability of their tools and/or techniques on real-life data. This category targets academics. The focus in this category is much more on the novelty of the techniques applied than the actual results. This provides a great opportunity for BPI researchers to show the practical applicability of their tools and/or techniques on real-life data.
  
-The winner: **Stephen Pauwels and Toon Calders** with their report entitled ​+The winner: **Stephen Pauwels and Toon Calders** of the **[[https://​www.uantwerpen.be/​nl/​|University of Antwerp]]** with their report entitled ​
 //​{{:​2018:​bpi2018_paper_10.pdf|Detecting and Explaining Drifts in Yearly Grant Applications}}//​ //​{{:​2018:​bpi2018_paper_10.pdf|Detecting and Explaining Drifts in Yearly Grant Applications}}//​
  
Line 90: Line 90:
 This category targets professionals to show their skills in analyzing business processes. The submitted reports are judged on their level of professionalism. The participants are expected to report on a broader range of aspects, where each aspect does not have to be developed in full detail. The report submitted in this category will be judged on its //​completeness of analysis// and usefulness for the purpose of a real-life business improvement setting. This category targets professionals to show their skills in analyzing business processes. The submitted reports are judged on their level of professionalism. The participants are expected to report on a broader range of aspects, where each aspect does not have to be developed in full detail. The report submitted in this category will be judged on its //​completeness of analysis// and usefulness for the purpose of a real-life business improvement setting.
  
-The winner: **Lalit Wangikar, Sumit Dhuwalia, Abhilasha Yadav, Bhavy Dikshit and Dikshant Yadav** with their report entitled ​+The winner: **Lalit Wangikar, Sumit Dhuwalia, Abhilasha Yadav, Bhavy Dikshit and Dikshant Yadav** from **[[https://​www.cognitioanalytics.com/​|Cognitio Analytics]]** with their report entitled ​
 //​{{:​2018:​bpi2018_paper_20.pdf|Faster Payments to Farmers: Analysis of the Direct Payments Process of EU's Agricultural Guarantee Fund}}// //​{{:​2018:​bpi2018_paper_20.pdf|Faster Payments to Farmers: Analysis of the Direct Payments Process of EU's Agricultural Guarantee Fund}}//