To prevent spam users, you can only post on this forum after registration, which is by invitation. If you want to post on the forum, please send me a mail (h DOT m DOT w DOT verbeek AT tue DOT nl) and I'll send you an invitation in return for an account.

"marker_name"+complete?

I am exporting BPMN 2.0 models from Signavio. In Signavio I model roughly like this:

start -> FA - > EX ->end

(FA and EX are the names of the event types in my dataset, none of which have a duration, I'm just interested in sequential ordering)

Then I import into PRoM (the representation of the BPMN model in PRoM looks the same as in Signavio) and convert into a Petri net for conformance checking. However, this is then translated roughly in the following way:

start -> FA+start -> FA+complete -> EX+start -> EX+complete -> end

The conformance check (replay petri net on data) gives different values for FA+start and FA+complete (same for EX).

What does the addition +start and +complete indicate? And why do I now have 2 of each of the 1 events I modeled in BPMN 2.0? 


Tagged:

Comments

  • JBuijsJBuijs Posts: 914
    Hi Aron,

    I think this is a 'feature' of the converter. I did not check but I believe Anna Kalenkova is the author of that plug-in. You might be able to contact her and ask:
    https://www.hse.ru/en/staff/akalenkova

    Please post here if you found a solution, or if you didn't.

    Joos Buijs

    Senior Data Scientist and process mining expert at APG (Dutch pension fund executor).
    Previously Assistant Professor in Process Mining at Eindhoven University of Technology
Sign In or Register to comment.