|
Lecturers: dr. N. Sidorova, dr. M. De Leoni Credits: 5 ECTS (=140 hours) Target audience: Master (CSE,BIS,ES) students interested in process technologies (process modeling, mining, management, simulation, …) and intending to work on their Master project at the Architecture of Information Systems group.
|
Timetable: Semester A, quartile 2 Seminar hours: Thursday, 10:45 – 12:30, AUD 14; Friday, 8:45 – 10:30, Metaforum 09 Assignment deadlines: Assignment 1: December 4, 2013, 9 a.m. Assignment 2: January 15, 2014, 9 a.m. |
Assignments are to be executed in the groups of 2 or individually.
The
grade for the course is defined as the weighted sum of points received for the
two parts of the assignment. The weight of Assignment 1 is 0.2 and the weight
of Assignment 2 is 0.8.
Send
your assignment to n.sidorova@tue.nl and
m.d.leoni@tue.nl with the subject
“Seminar AIS, Assignment N” before the deadline.
Being late implies obtaining 0 points for the
corresponding part of the assignment.
Assignments:
Assignment 1: write and present a review
of a Master thesis of a student graduated at the AIS group (see the full
description of the assignment on OASE)
Assignment 2: select a business process
(based on a real process) of a company, modeling this process as a Declare
model and as a CPN model, drawing the conclusions about the pros and cons of
declarative and imperative approaches to modeling (see the full description of
the assignment on OASE)
The slides used at the seminar can be found at OASE (oase.tue.nl)
Reading materials: You will find the links to a
selection of papers in the table below. Some of the links can only be used when
you are at the TU/e campus or by using the library proxy server: http://w3.tue.nl/en/services/library/about/helpdesk/proxy/
Tentative
planning
|
No |
Seminar date |
Subject |
Reading materials |
Homework |
|
1 |
November 13 |
Working on a Master thesis: do’s and don’ts Explanation of Assignment 1 (Natalia) |
Graduation
checklist : follow the links provided there. |
Assignment
1 (see OASE) |
|
2 |
November 14 |
Declarative versus Imperative Process Modeling Languages Explanation Assignment 2 (Massimiliano) |
Dirk Fahland, Daniel Lübke, Jan Mendling, Hajo Reijers, Barbara Weber, Matthias Weidlich,
Stefan Zugal. Declarative
versus Imperative Process Modeling Languages: The Issue of Understandability. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, volume 29, 2009, pp 353-366 Dirk Fahland, Jan Mendling, Hajo A. Reijers, Barbara Weber, Matthias Weidlich, Stefan Zugal, Declarative
versus Imperative Process Modeling Languages: The Issue of Maintainability.
Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, volume 43, 2010, pp
477-488 |
|
|
3 |
November 20 |
Modeling in Declare (Natalia) |
M. Reichert and B. Weber, “Chapter 12: Constraint-Based
Process Models”, in: M. Reichert and B. Weber, Enabling
Flexibility in Process-Aware Information Systems, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, Pages 341-374, 2012. DOI
10.1007/978-3-642-30409-5 |
Assignment
2 (see OASE) |
|
4 |
November 21 |
No seminar |
||
|
5 |
November 27 |
Q&A about Assignments 1 and 2 |
|
|
|
6 |
November 28 |
Guest lecture |
|
|
|
7 |
December 4 |
Presentations of Assignment 1 |
|
|
|
8 |
December 5 |
No seminar |
|
|
|
9 |
December 11 |
No seminar |
|
|
|
10 |
December 12 |
No seminar |
|
|
|
11 |
December 18 |
Presentations of intermediate results of Assignment 2 |
|
|
|
12 |
December 19 |
No seminar |
|
|
|
13 |
January 8 |
Q&A about Assignment 2 |
|
|
|
14 |
January 9 |
No seminar |
|
|
|
15 |
January 15 |
Final presentations of Assignment 2 |
|
|
|
16 |
January 16 |
No seminar |
|
|